<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!--Generated by Site-Server v@build.version@ (http://www.squarespace.com) on Thu, 21 May 2026 23:48:44 GMT
--><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:media="http://www.rssboard.org/media-rss" version="2.0"><channel><title>TURN Newsroom - TURN</title><link>https://www.turn.org/turn-newsroom/</link><lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 May 2026 18:09:10 +0000</lastBuildDate><language>en-US</language><generator>Site-Server v@build.version@ (http://www.squarespace.com)</generator><description><![CDATA[]]></description><item><title>Don’t Miss These Speakers Shaping the Future of California Agriculture</title><category>Newsroom</category><dc:creator>Alejandra Cruz</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 22:31:03 +0000</pubDate><link>https://www.morningagclips.com/dont-miss-these-speakers-shaping-the-future-of-california-agriculture/</link><guid isPermaLink="false">63c1c8c8e9c7381c9319452b:63c6fa36d8aa57147f387c7b:6a079ea7cd414e48f23c19cd</guid><description><![CDATA[Source: Morning AGClips | By AgPR

Panels will also explore the Make America Healthy Again movement, 
regenerative agriculture, the debate over new data centers, and more.  This 
widely attended Agri-Pulse event provides a great opportunity to discuss 
key issues affecting the state’s most important industry and network with a 
wide variety of stakeholders. Some of the confirmed and invited speakers 
include:

    * Secretary of the Interior Doug Burgum (invited)

    * California Department of Food and Agriculture Secretary Karen Ross

    * Shannon Douglass, President, California Farm Bureau 

And Adria Tinnin, Director of Race Equity and Legislative Policy for 
the Utility Reform Network.

With water cutbacks, labor shortages, regulatory burdens and global 
disruptions, it’s not easy for growers to stay both economically and 
environmentally sustainable in California.  ]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p data-rte-preserve-empty="true" class=""><strong>Source:</strong><span class="sqsrte-text-color--accent"> </span><a target="_blank" href="https://www.morningagclips.com/dont-miss-these-speakers-shaping-the-future-of-california-agriculture/"><span class="sqsrte-text-color--accent">Morning AgClips</span></a><span class="sqsrte-text-color--accent"> </span><strong>|By AgPR</strong></p><p data-rte-preserve-empty="true" class="">With water cutbacks, labor shortages, regulatory burdens and global disruptions, it’s not easy for growers to stay both economically and environmentally sustainable in California. &nbsp;</p><p data-rte-preserve-empty="true" class=""><span class="sqsrte-text-color--darkAccent"><strong><em>Panels will also explore the Make America Healthy Again movement, regenerative agriculture, the debate over new data centers, and more. &nbsp;This widely attended Agri-Pulse event provides a great opportunity to discuss key issues affecting the state’s most important industry and network with a wide variety of stakeholders. Some of the confirmed and invited speakers include:</em></strong></span></p><ul data-rte-list="default"><li><p data-rte-preserve-empty="true"><span class="sqsrte-text-color--darkAccent"><strong><em>Secretary of the Interior Doug Burgum (invited)</em></strong></span></p></li><li><p data-rte-preserve-empty="true"><span class="sqsrte-text-color--darkAccent"><strong><em>California Department of Food and Agriculture Secretary Karen Ross</em></strong></span></p></li><li><p data-rte-preserve-empty="true"><span class="sqsrte-text-color--darkAccent"><strong><em>Shannon Douglass, President, California Farm Bureau&nbsp;</em></strong></span></p></li></ul><p data-rte-preserve-empty="true"><span class="sqsrte-text-color--darkAccent"><strong><em>And Adria Tinnin,&nbsp;Director of Race Equity and Legislative Policy for the&nbsp;Utility Reform Network</em></strong></span></p><p data-rte-preserve-empty="true">&nbsp;</p>


  






  



&nbsp;
  
  
  
    
      
        
      
    
    <input placeholder="Search" type="search" class="search-input" value="" aria-label="Search"
    />
  
  
  
    
    
      
        No results found
        
      
    
  
<p><a href="https://www.turn.org/turn-newsroom/dont-miss-these-speakers-shaping-the-future-of-california-agriculture">Permalink</a><p>]]></content:encoded><media:content type="image/png" url="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/63c1c8c8e9c7381c9319452b/1745965194440-UA8FYO3SM0UOXT5KCFVA/2025+TURN+Thumbnails-04.png?format=1500w" medium="image" isDefault="true" width="1500" height="847"><media:title type="plain">Don’t Miss These Speakers Shaping the Future of California Agriculture</media:title></media:content></item><item><title>Consumer, Civil Rights Groups Urge Congress to Oppose 100%+ APR Bank Loans</title><category>Newsroom</category><dc:creator>Alejandra Cruz</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2026 16:52:02 +0000</pubDate><link>https://www.vitallaw.com/news/loans-consumer-civil-rights-groups-urge-congress-to-oppose-100-apr-bank-loans/blw018c7045b50a214fecba1941c337965d18?refURL=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2F#.</link><guid isPermaLink="false">63c1c8c8e9c7381c9319452b:63c6fa36d8aa57147f387c7b:69fa20322353b0370bcf7146</guid><description><![CDATA[Source: VitalLaw | By Shashi Kant

Groups say public backs rate caps. The coalition said strong bipartisan 
majorities support interest-rate limits and described them as the simplest 
and most effective way to stop unaffordable lending. In the press release, 
the National Consumer Law Center said Congress should address affordability 
pressures by stopping banks from making high-cost loans, restoring and 
defending states’ ability to protect residents, and capping rates 
nationally.  The Utility Reform Network is one of the groups urging 
congressional leaders to oppose these loans.  

A coalition of 103 consumer, civil rights, and community organizations 
urged congressional leaders to oppose what they described as “unaffordable 
100%+ APR bank loans,” pressing lawmakers to block efforts that they say 
would expand high-cost lending through bank charters and federal 
rate-export rules. ]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p data-rte-preserve-empty="true" class=""><strong>Source:</strong><a target="_blank" href="https://www.vitallaw.com/news/loans-consumer-civil-rights-groups-urge-congress-to-oppose-100-apr-bank-loans/blw018c7045b50a214fecba1941c337965d18?refURL=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2F#."><span class="sqsrte-text-color--accent">VitalLaw</span></a><strong>|By Sha</strong></p><p data-rte-preserve-empty="true" class="">A coalition of 103 consumer, civil rights, and community organizations urged congressional leaders to oppose what they described as “unaffordable 100%+ APR bank loans,” pressing lawmakers to block efforts that they say would expand high-cost lending through bank charters and federal rate-export rules.&nbsp;</p><p data-rte-preserve-empty="true" class=""><span class="sqsrte-text-color--darkAccent"><strong><em>Groups say public backs rate caps.&nbsp;The coalition said strong bipartisan majorities support interest-rate limits and described them as the simplest and most effective way to stop unaffordable lending. In the press release, the National Consumer Law Center said Congress should address affordability pressures by stopping banks from making high-cost loans, restoring and defending states’ ability to protect residents, and capping rates nationally. &nbsp;The Utility Reform Network is one of the groups urging congressional&nbsp;leaders to oppose these loans. &nbsp;</em></strong></span></p>


  






  



&nbsp;
  
  
  
    
      
        
      
    
    <input placeholder="Search" type="search" class="search-input" value="" aria-label="Search"
    />
  
  
  
    
    
      
        No results found
        
      
    
  
<p><a href="https://www.turn.org/turn-newsroom/consumer-civil-rights-groups-urge-congress-to-oppose-100-apr-bank-loans">Permalink</a><p>]]></content:encoded><media:content type="image/png" url="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/63c1c8c8e9c7381c9319452b/1745965194440-UA8FYO3SM0UOXT5KCFVA/2025+TURN+Thumbnails-04.png?format=1500w" medium="image" isDefault="true" width="1500" height="847"><media:title type="plain">Consumer, Civil Rights Groups Urge Congress to Oppose 100%+ APR Bank Loans</media:title></media:content></item><item><title>PG&amp;E Ads and Rate Increases</title><category>Newsroom</category><dc:creator>Alejandra Cruz</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 21:21:26 +0000</pubDate><link>https://kfax.com/podcasts/life-line-with-craig-roberts/life-line-with-craig-roberts-04-30-26-hour-1</link><guid isPermaLink="false">63c1c8c8e9c7381c9319452b:63c6fa36d8aa57147f387c7b:69f3c7d6f545ac40ad6051fe</guid><description><![CDATA[Source: Lifeline with Craig Roberts | By Craig Roberts, Guest speaker Mark 
Toney

“Mark: here’s what’s going on and the fundamental problems that we are 
facing.  There are no limits to how much PG&E can ask for rate increases, 
no limits to how many times a year they can ask for increases and no limits 
to how much the California Public Utilities Commission can grant in rate 
increases.  Right now, PG&E has multiple rate increases sitting on the 
table of the CPUC.  It’s more than two, more than three, it’s nine rate 
increases, count them, for a total of $4 billion.  I don’t believe this 
nonsense about your rates going down, that is just a blip and your rates 
are going right back up.”

Craig: it was only a bare year ago when our friends at PG&E took out ads, 
television, radio, streaming ads all to tell us how much cheaper our bills 
have become.  Paid for by               ratepayers, I must add, and all of 
the savings really amounted to a dollar a month.  So I opened my latest 
bill and noticed that they are asking for, you guessed it, rate increases. 
 Remember the old adage what goes up must come down?  PG&E’s got a new 
twist on that and it’s what goes down must come up, so I said to myself we 
need to talk to our old buddy Mark Toney at The Utility Reform Network.]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p data-rte-preserve-empty="true" class=""><strong>Source:</strong><span class="sqsrte-text-color--accent"> </span><a target="_blank" href="https://kfax.com/podcasts/life-line-with-craig-roberts/life-line-with-craig-roberts-04-30-26-hour-1"><span class="sqsrte-text-color--accent">Lifeline with Craig Roberts </span></a><span class="sqsrte-text-color--accent"> </span><strong>|By Mark Toney, Guest</strong></p><p data-rte-preserve-empty="true" class=""><strong>“Craig:</strong>&nbsp;it was only a bare year ago when our friends at PG&amp;E took out ads, television, radio, streaming ads all to tell us how much cheaper our bills have become. &nbsp;Paid for by ratepayers, I must add, and all of the savings really amounted to a dollar a month. &nbsp;So I opened my latest bill and noticed that they are asking for, you guessed it, rate increases. &nbsp;Remember the old adage what goes up must come down? &nbsp;PG&amp;E’s got a new twist on that and it’s what goes down must come up, so I said to myself we need to talk to our old buddy Mark Toney at The Utility Reform Network.”</p><p data-rte-preserve-empty="true" class=""><span class="sqsrte-text-color--darkAccent"><strong><em><br>“Mark:&nbsp;here’s what’s going on and the fundamental problems that we are facing. &nbsp;There are no limits to how much PG&amp;E can ask for rate increases, no limits to how many times a year they can ask for increases and no limits to how much the California Public Utilities Commission can grant in rate increases. &nbsp;Right now, PG&amp;E has multiple rate increases sitting on the table of the CPUC. &nbsp;It’s more than two, more than three, it’s nine rate increases, count them, for a total of $4 billion. &nbsp;I don’t believe this nonsense about your rates going down, that is just a blip and your rates are going right back up.”</em></strong></span></p>


  






  



&nbsp;
  
  
  
    
      
        
      
    
    <input placeholder="Search" type="search" class="search-input" value="" aria-label="Search"
    />
  
  
  
    
    
      
        No results found
        
      
    
  
<p><a href="https://www.turn.org/turn-newsroom/pge-ads-and-rate-increases">Permalink</a><p>]]></content:encoded><media:content type="image/png" url="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/63c1c8c8e9c7381c9319452b/1745965194440-UA8FYO3SM0UOXT5KCFVA/2025+TURN+Thumbnails-04.png?format=1500w" medium="image" isDefault="true" width="1500" height="847"><media:title type="plain">PG&amp;E Ads and Rate Increases</media:title></media:content></item><item><title>California Agency Report Recommends Reforms to Inverse Condemnation and Subrogation for Wildfire Resilience</title><category>Newsroom</category><dc:creator>Alejandra Cruz</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 21:17:06 +0000</pubDate><link>https://www.turn.org/turn-newsroom/california-agency-report-recommends-reforms-to-inverse-condemnation-and-subrogation-for-wildfire-resilience</link><guid isPermaLink="false">63c1c8c8e9c7381c9319452b:63c6fa36d8aa57147f387c7b:69f3c6d227f0a7438378cc7f</guid><description><![CDATA[Source: CEB News | By Mary Katherine O’Connor

Mark Toney, the executive director of The Utility Reform Network (TURN), a 
clean and affordable energy advocacy nonprofit, remembers how the Eaton 
Fire changed the narrative around the Wildfire Fund. “It is not sustainable 
to be coming back to ratepayers every few years,” he recalls saying at the 
time. “Every time it's a big fire.” 

As utilities, insurers and residents struggle to find ways to mitigate and 
pay for wildfire damages, California policymakers are seeking new models 
and strategies that the state could pursue to mitigate damage, facilitate 
faster post-fire recovery plans and redistribute the cost burdens from 
fires, across stakeholders. ]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p data-rte-preserve-empty="true" class=""><strong>Source:</strong><span class="sqsrte-text-color--accent"> CEB News </span><strong>|By Mary Katherine O’Connor</strong></p><p data-rte-preserve-empty="true" class="">As utilities, insurers and residents struggle to find ways to mitigate and pay for wildfire damages, California policymakers are seeking new models and strategies that the state could pursue to mitigate damage, facilitate faster post-fire recovery plans and redistribute the cost burdens from fires, across stakeholders.&nbsp;</p><p data-rte-preserve-empty="true" class=""><span class="sqsrte-text-color--darkAccent"><strong><em>Mark Toney, the executive director of&nbsp;The Utility Reform Network&nbsp;(TURN), a clean and affordable energy advocacy nonprofit, remembers how the Eaton Fire changed the narrative around the Wildfire Fund. “It is not sustainable to be coming back to ratepayers every few years,” he recalls saying at the time. “Every time it's a big fire.”&nbsp;</em></strong></span></p>


  






  



&nbsp;
  
  
  
    
      
        
      
    
    <input placeholder="Search" type="search" class="search-input" value="" aria-label="Search"
    />
  
  
  
    
    
      
        No results found
        
      
    
  
<p><a href="https://www.turn.org/turn-newsroom/california-agency-report-recommends-reforms-to-inverse-condemnation-and-subrogation-for-wildfire-resilience">Permalink</a><p>]]></content:encoded><media:content type="image/png" url="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/63c1c8c8e9c7381c9319452b/1745965194440-UA8FYO3SM0UOXT5KCFVA/2025+TURN+Thumbnails-04.png?format=1500w" medium="image" isDefault="true" width="1500" height="847"><media:title type="plain">California Agency Report Recommends Reforms to Inverse Condemnation and Subrogation for Wildfire Resilience</media:title></media:content></item><item><title>Commenters Urge CPUC to Reject COLR Rule Changes Proposed by AT&amp;T and Cal Advocates</title><category>Newsroom</category><dc:creator>Alejandra Cruz</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 17:01:53 +0000</pubDate><link>https://communicationsdaily.com/article/2026/04/28/commenters-urge-cpuc-to-reject-colr-rule-changes-proposed-by-att-and-cal-advocates-2604270043?BC=bc_69f0314f1fe6f</link><guid isPermaLink="false">63c1c8c8e9c7381c9319452b:63c6fa36d8aa57147f387c7b:69ef96815101e87011d7e19b</guid><description><![CDATA[Source: Communications Daily | By Philip Athey

The Utility Reform Network (TURN) called the joint proposal “a giant step 
backward for consumers” that would “widen the digital divide,” even with 
the “small number” of fiber deployments that it includes. In comments fi
led Friday, TURN also pointed out a number of disagreements that Cal 
Advocates and AT&T seem to have even within their proposal, including 
whether the “relief areas” should be geographically contiguous, whether 
there should be extra enforcement mechanisms beyond what's in the proposal, 
and whether California Lifeline participation should be perpetual or 
limited to just five years.

Independent consumer advocacy organizations called on the California Public 
Utilities Commission (CPUC) to reject a proposal that would allow telecom 
providers in the state to relinquish their carrier of last resort (COLR) 
status in exchange for fiber expansion in areas where broadband is already 
largely available.  ]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p data-rte-preserve-empty="true" class=""><strong>Source:</strong><span class="sqsrte-text-color--accent"> </span><a target="_blank" href="https://communicationsdaily.com/article/2026/04/28/commenters-urge-cpuc-to-reject-colr-rule-changes-proposed-by-att-and-cal-advocates-2604270043?BC=bc_69f0314f1fe6f"><span class="sqsrte-text-color--accent">Communications Daily</span></a><span class="sqsrte-text-color--accent"> </span><strong>|By Philip Athey</strong></p><p data-rte-preserve-empty="true" class="">Independent consumer advocacy organizations called on the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) to reject a proposal that would allow telecom providers in the state to relinquish their carrier of last resort (COLR) status in exchange for fiber expansion in areas where broadband is already largely available. &nbsp;</p><p data-rte-preserve-empty="true" class=""><span class="sqsrte-text-color--darkAccent"><strong><em>The Utility Reform Network (TURN) called the joint proposal “a giant step backward for consumers” that would “widen the digital divide,” even with the “small number” of fiber deployments that it includes. In comments filed Friday, TURN also pointed out a number of disagreements that Cal Advocates and AT&amp;T seem to have even within their proposal, including whether the “relief areas” should be geographically contiguous, whether there should be extra enforcement mechanisms beyond what's in the proposal, and whether California Lifeline participation should be perpetual or limited to just five years.</em></strong></span></p>


  






  



&nbsp;
  
  
  
    
      
        
      
    
    <input placeholder="Search" type="search" class="search-input" value="" aria-label="Search"
    />
  
  
  
    
    
      
        No results found
        
      
    
  
<p><a href="https://www.turn.org/turn-newsroom/commenters-urge-cpuc-to-reject-colr-rule-changes-proposed-by-att-and-cal-advocates">Permalink</a><p>]]></content:encoded><media:content type="image/png" url="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/63c1c8c8e9c7381c9319452b/1745965194440-UA8FYO3SM0UOXT5KCFVA/2025+TURN+Thumbnails-04.png?format=1500w" medium="image" isDefault="true" width="1500" height="847"><media:title type="plain">Commenters Urge CPUC to Reject COLR Rule Changes Proposed by AT&amp;T and Cal Advocates</media:title></media:content></item><item><title>4-Day CPUC Proceedings Bring Agency Closer to Decision on Charter/Cox Merger</title><category>Newsroom</category><dc:creator>Alejandra Cruz</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2026 16:58:35 +0000</pubDate><link>https://communicationsdaily.com/article/view?search_id=74165&amp;id=2694438</link><guid isPermaLink="false">63c1c8c8e9c7381c9319452b:63c6fa36d8aa57147f387c7b:69ef95bb9ddf5d32e005461a</guid><description><![CDATA[Source: Communications Daily | By Philip Athey

However, Alexandra Green, a telecom regulatory attorney for The Utility 
Reform Network (TURN), pointed out that Charter has no commitment to lower 
prices, even if the economics of the merger would allow them to. She also 
said during her cross-examination of Falk that while Charter has implied 
that the growing customer base would lead to more Charter employees, the 
company has no commitment to growing its workforce post-merger.  

After four days of testimony from 10 witnesses, the California Public 
Utilities Commission evidentiary hearing on the $34.5 billion Charter/Cox 
deal ended Thursday, inching the commission toward a final decision on the 
merger.  The Charter/Cox transaction has already received approval from the 
FCC and DOJ, as well as regulators in New York and Connecticut, leaving the 
CPUC as the last barrier to Charter becoming the largest U.S. ISP and cable 
company. ]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p data-rte-preserve-empty="true" class=""><strong>Source:</strong><span class="sqsrte-text-color--accent"> </span><a target="_blank" href="https://communicationsdaily.com/article/view?search_id=74165&amp;id=2694438"><span class="sqsrte-text-color--accent">Communications Daily</span></a><span class="sqsrte-text-color--accent">‍  ‍</span><strong>|By Philip Athey</strong></p><p data-rte-preserve-empty="true" class="">After four days of testimony from 10 witnesses, the California Public Utilities Commission evidentiary hearing on the $34.5 billion Charter/Cox deal ended Thursday, inching the commission toward a final decision on the merger. &nbsp;The Charter/Cox transaction has already received approval from the FCC and DOJ, as well as regulators in New York and Connecticut, leaving the CPUC as the last barrier to Charter becoming the largest U.S. ISP and cable company.&nbsp;</p><p data-rte-preserve-empty="true" class=""><span class="sqsrte-text-color--darkAccent"><strong><em>However, Alexandra Green, a telecom regulatory attorney for The Utility Reform Network (TURN), pointed out that Charter has no commitment to lower prices, even if the economics of the merger would allow them to. She also said during her cross-examination of Falk that while Charter has implied that the growing customer base would lead to more Charter employees, the company has no commitment to growing its workforce post-merger. &nbsp;</em></strong></span></p>


  






  



&nbsp;
  
  
  
    
      
        
      
    
    <input placeholder="Search" type="search" class="search-input" value="" aria-label="Search"
    />
  
  
  
    
    
      
        No results found
        
      
    
  
<p><a href="https://www.turn.org/turn-newsroom/4-day-cpuc-proceedings-bring-agency-closer-to-decision-on-charter/cox-merger">Permalink</a><p>]]></content:encoded><media:content type="image/png" url="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/63c1c8c8e9c7381c9319452b/1745965194440-UA8FYO3SM0UOXT5KCFVA/2025+TURN+Thumbnails-04.png?format=1500w" medium="image" isDefault="true" width="1500" height="847"><media:title type="plain">4-Day CPUC Proceedings Bring Agency Closer to Decision on Charter/Cox Merger</media:title></media:content></item><item><title>Charter Execs Queried on Emergency, Low-Income Services in Utilities Hearing</title><category>Newsroom</category><dc:creator>Alejandra Cruz</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 17:51:23 +0000</pubDate><link>https://www.mlex.com/mlex/articles/2467702/charter-execs-queried-on-emergency-low-income-services-in-utilities-hearing</link><guid isPermaLink="false">63c1c8c8e9c7381c9319452b:63c6fa36d8aa57147f387c7b:69e6679b187a2966bc540427</guid><description><![CDATA[Source: MLex.com | By Wesley Brown

TURN questioned Dave Rodrian, Charter's group vice president of WiFi and 
Connected Home, about Charter’s Invincible WiFi, which works to continue 
customers’ internet access during a power outage, as well as its 
limitations on customers moving equipment and using the feature.  TURN also 
keyed in on Charter’s promotional offerings and the company’s transparency 
regarding consumer pricing once a promotional period ends.

Executives from Charter Communications faced questions Monday about the 
company's services during emergencies and commitments to services for 
low-income customers at the start of a week-long evidentiary hearing in 
front of an administrative law judge for the California Public Utilities 
Commission.  Charter's acquisition of Cox Communications hinges on final 
approval of the deal in California, where the hearing kicked off by 
focusing on the company's dealings and how they could impact California 
residents.]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p data-rte-preserve-empty="true" class=""><strong>Source:</strong><span class="sqsrte-text-color--accent"> </span><a target="_blank" href="https://www.mlex.com/mlex/articles/2467702/charter-execs-queried-on-emergency-low-income-services-in-utilities-hearing"><span class="sqsrte-text-color--accent">MLex.com </span></a><span class="sqsrte-text-color--accent"> </span><strong>|By Wesley Brown</strong></p><p data-rte-preserve-empty="true" class="">Executives from Charter Communications faced questions Monday about the company's services during emergencies and commitments to services for low-income customers at the start of a week-long evidentiary hearing in front of an administrative law judge for the California Public Utilities Commission. &nbsp;Charter's acquisition of Cox Communications hinges on final approval of the deal in California, where the hearing kicked off by focusing on the company's dealings and how they could impact California residents.</p><p data-rte-preserve-empty="true" class=""><span class="sqsrte-text-color--darkAccent"><strong><em>TURN questioned Dave Rodrian, Charter's group vice president of WiFi and Connected Home, about Charter’s Invincible WiFi, which works to continue customers’ internet access during a power outage, as well as its limitations on customers moving equipment and using the feature. &nbsp;TURN also keyed in on Charter’s promotional offerings and the company’s transparency regarding consumer pricing once a promotional period ends.</em></strong></span></p>


  






  



&nbsp;
  
  
  
    
      
        
      
    
    <input placeholder="Search" type="search" class="search-input" value="" aria-label="Search"
    />
  
  
  
    
    
      
        No results found
        
      
    
  
<p><a href="https://www.turn.org/turn-newsroom/charter-execs-queried-on-emergency-low-income-services-in-utilities-hearing">Permalink</a><p>]]></content:encoded><media:content type="image/png" url="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/63c1c8c8e9c7381c9319452b/1745965194440-UA8FYO3SM0UOXT5KCFVA/2025+TURN+Thumbnails-04.png?format=1500w" medium="image" isDefault="true" width="1500" height="847"><media:title type="plain">Charter Execs Queried on Emergency, Low-Income Services in Utilities Hearing</media:title></media:content></item><item><title>FERC Rejects Reform, Leaves Customers Paying for Utility Trade Associations</title><category>Newsroom</category><dc:creator>Alejandra Cruz</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2026 17:46:05 +0000</pubDate><link>https://energyandpolicy.org/ferc-rejection-trade-association-dues/</link><guid isPermaLink="false">63c1c8c8e9c7381c9319452b:63c6fa36d8aa57147f387c7b:69e6665dc2072a18990ad6d5</guid><description><![CDATA[Source: Energy And Policy Institute | By Matt Kasper

TURN wrote: “FERC should adopt standard transparency requirements for 
utilities seeking rate recovery of industry association dues, including 
disclosure of the association’s costs for the following NARUC cost 
categories: (1) Legislative Advocacy, (2) Legislative Policy Research, (3) 
Regulatory Advocacy, (4) Advertising, (5) Marketing, and (6) Public 
Relations. These requirements would enable the regulator to ensure that 
ratepayers pay only for costs that confer clear benefits on ratepayers, and 
do not pay for the association’s political activities or public policy 
advocacy.”

TURN referenced NARUC’s audits of the trade associations that occurred 
briefly in the 1980s and 1990s. The audits informed state regulators how to 
treat trade association costs by using those various cost category details. 
NARUC no longer conducts the audits, nor do the trade associations provide 
those breakdowns.

Federal energy regulators voted yesterday to keep in place accounting rules 
that allow monopoly utilities to charge customers for trade association 
activities, including political advocacy. The decision rejects calls to 
reform accounting rules and protect customers from footing the bill for 
these expenses. ]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p data-rte-preserve-empty="true" class=""><strong>Source:</strong><span class="sqsrte-text-color--accent"> </span><a target="_blank" href="https://energyandpolicy.org/ferc-rejection-trade-association-dues/"><span class="sqsrte-text-color--accent">Energy and Policy Institute</span></a><span class="sqsrte-text-color--accent"> </span><strong>|By Matt Kasper</strong></p><p data-rte-preserve-empty="true" class="">Federal energy regulators voted yesterday to keep in place accounting rules that allow monopoly utilities to charge customers for trade association activities, including political advocacy. The decision rejects calls to reform accounting rules and protect customers from footing the bill for these expenses.&nbsp;</p><p data-rte-preserve-empty="true" class=""><span class="sqsrte-text-color--darkAccent"><strong><em>TURN wrote: “FERC should adopt standard transparency requirements for utilities seeking rate recovery of industry association dues, including disclosure of the association’s costs for the following NARUC cost categories: (1) Legislative Advocacy, (2) Legislative Policy Research, (3) Regulatory Advocacy, (4) Advertising, (5) Marketing, and (6) Public Relations. These requirements would enable the regulator to ensure that ratepayers pay only for costs that confer clear benefits on ratepayers, and do not pay for the association’s political activities or public policy advocacy.” TURN referenced NARUC’s audits of the trade associations that occurred briefly in the 1980s and 1990s. The audits informed state regulators how to treat trade association costs by using those various cost category details. NARUC no longer conducts the audits, nor do the trade associations provide those breakdowns.</em></strong></span></p>


  






  



&nbsp;
  
  
  
    
      
        
      
    
    <input placeholder="Search" type="search" class="search-input" value="" aria-label="Search"
    />
  
  
  
    
    
      
        No results found
        
      
    
  
<p><a href="https://www.turn.org/turn-newsroom/ferc-rejects-reform-leaves-customers-paying-for-utility-trade-associations">Permalink</a><p>]]></content:encoded><media:content type="image/png" url="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/63c1c8c8e9c7381c9319452b/1745965194440-UA8FYO3SM0UOXT5KCFVA/2025+TURN+Thumbnails-04.png?format=1500w" medium="image" isDefault="true" width="1500" height="847"><media:title type="plain">FERC Rejects Reform, Leaves Customers Paying for Utility Trade Associations</media:title></media:content></item><item><title>Why the Heck Are My Electric Bills So High?</title><category>Newsroom</category><dc:creator>Alejandra Cruz</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 22:35:49 +0000</pubDate><link> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6OhF62nEhDQ</link><guid isPermaLink="false">63c1c8c8e9c7381c9319452b:63c6fa36d8aa57147f387c7b:69dd6fc54c843f4377644461</guid><description><![CDATA[Source: The Energy Show | By Barry Cinnamon

Mark: one of the things we are looking at is 'what’s the energy 
affordability crisis look like?'  About 20% of all customers, five million 
customers in California are behind on their bills.  Another indication is 
how many families get shut off; in the past year, over 150,000 households 
had their electricity shut off because they fell behind on their bills. 
 Almost 40,000 were never reconnected.  A crisis also looks at what’s 
happening to small businesses that are shutting their doors because of 
electricity prices.  One of the things that TURN does is we have an 
alliance with large industries, agriculture, small businesses and other 
industrial sectors.  These businesses get hit double every month so the 
price of electricity is baked into grocery store prices so everyone feels 
it over and over again in everything we buy.

Barry: so if you’re wondering why your energy bills are so high, then I 
suggest you turn to TURN; my guest on this week’s show is Mark Toney, he’s 
the Executive Director of TURN.  I would characterize him as a thinking 
bulldog when it comes to solving the structural problems of high energy 
costs.  Welcome to the show, Mark!]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p data-rte-preserve-empty="true" class=""><strong>Source:</strong><span class="sqsrte-text-color--accent"> </span><a target="_blank" href="https:// https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6OhF62nEhDQ"><span class="sqsrte-text-color--accent">The Energy Show</span></a><span class="sqsrte-text-color--accent"> </span><strong>|By Barry Cinnamon</strong></p><p data-rte-preserve-empty="true" class="">Barry: so if you’re wondering why your energy bills are so high, then I suggest you turn to TURN; my guest on this week’s show is Mark Toney, he’s the Executive Director of TURN. &nbsp;I would characterize him as a thinking bulldog when it comes to solving the structural problems of high energy costs. &nbsp;Welcome to the show, Mark!</p><p data-rte-preserve-empty="true" class=""><span class="sqsrte-text-color--darkAccent"><strong><em>Mark: one of the things we are looking at is 'what’s the energy affordability crisis look like?' &nbsp;About 20% of all customers, five million customers in California are behind on their bills. &nbsp;Another indication is how many families get shut off; in the past year, over 150,000 households had their electricity shut off because they fell behind on their bills. &nbsp;Almost 40,000 were never reconnected. &nbsp;A crisis also looks at what’s happening to small businesses that are shutting their doors because of electricity prices. &nbsp;One of the things that TURN does is we have an alliance with large industries, agriculture, small businesses and other industrial sectors. &nbsp;These businesses get hit double every month so the price of electricity is baked into grocery store prices so everyone feels it over and over again in everything we buy.</em></strong></span></p>


  






  



&nbsp;
  
  
  
    
      
        
      
    
    <input placeholder="Search" type="search" class="search-input" value="" aria-label="Search"
    />
  
  
  
    
    
      
        No results found
        
      
    
  
<p><a href="https://www.turn.org/turn-newsroom/why-the-heck-are-my-electric-bills-so-high">Permalink</a><p>]]></content:encoded><media:content type="image/png" url="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/63c1c8c8e9c7381c9319452b/1745965194440-UA8FYO3SM0UOXT5KCFVA/2025+TURN+Thumbnails-04.png?format=1500w" medium="image" isDefault="true" width="1500" height="847"><media:title type="plain">Why the Heck Are My Electric Bills So High?</media:title></media:content></item><item><title>California Grid Manager Foresees $7B in Upgrades in Next Decade</title><category>Newsroom</category><dc:creator>Alejandra Cruz</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 22:28:12 +0000</pubDate><link>https://archive.is/20260410152439/https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/2026/04/09/california-grid-manager-foresees-7b-in-upgrades-in-next-decade/</link><guid isPermaLink="false">63c1c8c8e9c7381c9319452b:63c6fa36d8aa57147f387c7b:69dd6dfc48ebcf1b4066e8ee</guid><description><![CDATA[Source: The San Diego Tribune | By Rob Nikolewski

Mark Toney, executive director of The Utility Reform Network, a consumer 
advocacy group based in Oakland, fears the $7 billion figure “could be a 
low-ball estimate” compared to what the proposed upgrades will eventually 
cost.  “We’re worried that the affordability crisis is going to get worse, 
not better,” Toney said.

A draft proposal from the California Independent Systems Operator, which 
manages most of the state’s power grid, recommends $7 billion in 
transmission build-outs over the next decade to help the Golden State 
achieve its clean energy goals and meet growing demand for electricity.  T
he plan recommends 38 transmission upgrades to allow the grid to handle 
increased load growth over the next 10 years — driven in large part by data 
centers for artificial intelligence, the electrification of buildings and 
further adoption of electric vehicles in the transportation sector.]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p data-rte-preserve-empty="true" class=""><strong>Source:</strong><span class="sqsrte-text-color--accent"> </span><a target="_blank" href="https://archive.is/20260410152439/https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/2026/04/09/california-grid-manager-foresees-7b-in-upgrades-in-next-decade/"><span class="sqsrte-text-color--accent">The San Diego Tribune</span></a><span class="sqsrte-text-color--accent">‍  ‍</span><strong>|By Rob Nikolewski</strong></p><p data-rte-preserve-empty="true" class="">A draft proposal from the California Independent Systems Operator, which manages most of the state’s power grid,&nbsp;recommends $7 billion in transmission&nbsp;build-outs&nbsp;over the next decade to help the Golden State achieve its clean energy goals and meet growing demand for electricity. The plan recommends 38 transmission upgrades to allow the grid to handle increased load growth over the next 10 years — driven in large part by data centers for artificial intelligence, the electrification of buildings and further adoption of electric vehicles in the transportation sector.</p><p data-rte-preserve-empty="true" class=""><span class="sqsrte-text-color--darkAccent"><strong><em>Mark Toney, executive director of the Utility Reform Network, a consumer advocacy group based in Oakland, fears the $7 billion figure “could be a low-ball estimate” compared to what the proposed upgrades will eventually cost. &nbsp;“We’re worried that the affordability crisis is going to get worse, not better,” Toney said.</em></strong></span></p>


  






  



&nbsp;
  
  
  
    
      
        
      
    
    <input placeholder="Search" type="search" class="search-input" value="" aria-label="Search"
    />
  
  
  
    
    
      
        No results found
        
      
    
  
<p><a href="https://www.turn.org/turn-newsroom/california-grid-manager-foresees-7b-in-upgrades-in-next-decade">Permalink</a><p>]]></content:encoded><media:content type="image/png" url="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/63c1c8c8e9c7381c9319452b/1745965194440-UA8FYO3SM0UOXT5KCFVA/2025+TURN+Thumbnails-04.png?format=1500w" medium="image" isDefault="true" width="1500" height="847"><media:title type="plain">California Grid Manager Foresees $7B in Upgrades in Next Decade</media:title></media:content></item><item><title>The debate for Keeping Diablo Canyon Open Past 2030 Is On. What Could Open Past 2030 Is On. What Could It Mean for Your Bills?</title><category>Newsroom</category><dc:creator>Alejandra Cruz</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2026 22:21:35 +0000</pubDate><link>https://www.kqed.org/science/2000605/the-debate-for-keeping-diablo-canyon-open-past-2030-is-on-what-could-it-mean-for-your-bills </link><guid isPermaLink="false">63c1c8c8e9c7381c9319452b:63c6fa36d8aa57147f387c7b:69dd6c6f1432311f974759af</guid><description><![CDATA[Source: KQED | By Laura Klivans

“It’s just kind of shocking how bad the deal was for ratepayers,” said 
Matthew Freedman, an attorney with The Utility Reform Network, who was 
consulted by the authors of the UC Santa Barbara Report, and has been 
raising the same concerns for years.  

California’s last working nuclear power plant cleared the final hurdle this 
month to keep producing energy. The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 
deemed the plant safe and environmentally sound to operate until 2045.  But 
under current California law, the plant only has until 2030, unless the 
state legislature takes action, a conversation that is gaining momentum in 
Sacramento.]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p data-rte-preserve-empty="true" class=""><strong>Source:</strong><span class="sqsrte-text-color--accent"> </span><a target="_blank" href="https://www.kqed.org/science/2000605/the-debate-for-keeping-diablo-canyon-open-past-2030-is-on-what-could-it-mean-for-your-bills "><span class="sqsrte-text-color--accent">KQED </span></a><span class="sqsrte-text-color--accent"> </span><strong>|By Laura Klivans</strong></p><p data-rte-preserve-empty="true" class="">California’s last working nuclear power plant cleared the final hurdle this month to keep producing energy. The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission deemed the plant safe and environmentally sound to operate until 2045. &nbsp;But under current California law, the plant only has until 2030, unless the state legislature takes action, a conversation that is gaining momentum in Sacramento.</p><p data-rte-preserve-empty="true" class=""><span class="sqsrte-text-color--darkAccent"><strong><em>“It’s just kind of shocking how bad the deal was for ratepayers,” said Matthew Freedman, an attorney with The Utility Reform Network, who was consulted by the authors of the UC Santa Barbara Report, and has been raising the same concerns for years. &nbsp;</em></strong></span></p>


  






  



&nbsp;
  
  
  
    
      
        
      
    
    <input placeholder="Search" type="search" class="search-input" value="" aria-label="Search"
    />
  
  
  
    
    
      
        No results found
        
      
    
  
<p><a href="https://www.turn.org/turn-newsroom/the-debate-for-keeping-diablo-canyon-open-past-2030-is-on-what-could-open-past-2030-is-on-what-could-it-mean-for-your-bills">Permalink</a><p>]]></content:encoded><media:content type="image/png" url="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/63c1c8c8e9c7381c9319452b/1745965194440-UA8FYO3SM0UOXT5KCFVA/2025+TURN+Thumbnails-04.png?format=1500w" medium="image" isDefault="true" width="1500" height="847"><media:title type="plain">The debate for Keeping Diablo Canyon Open Past 2030 Is On. What Could Open Past 2030 Is On. What Could It Mean for Your Bills?</media:title></media:content></item><item><title>California Hearings on Charger-Cox Deal Approaching</title><category>Newsroom</category><dc:creator>Alejandra Cruz</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2026 22:15:50 +0000</pubDate><link>https://broadbandbreakfast.com/california-hearings-on-charter-cox-deal-approaching/</link><guid isPermaLink="false">63c1c8c8e9c7381c9319452b:63c6fa36d8aa57147f387c7b:69dd6b1648ebcf1b4065ac93</guid><description><![CDATA[Source: Broadband Breakfast | By Jake Neenan

A set of advocacy groups including The Utility Reform Network and the 
CPUC’s Public Advocates Office asked the agency to hold evidentiary 
hearings on a number of issues, including Charter upgrading and expanding 
its network after the deal, the merger’s effect on consumer privacy and 
Charter’s diversity commitments.

California’s telecom regulator is set to hold evidentiary hearings this 
month in its review of the $34.5 billion Charter-Cox merger. The hearings 
are set for April 20-24.  The California Public Utilities Commission is the 
last remaining agency that needs to clear the deal. The Federal 
Communications Commission, Justice Department, and states like New York and 
Connecticut have cleared the transaction.]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p data-rte-preserve-empty="true" class=""><strong>Source:</strong><span class="sqsrte-text-color--accent"> </span><a target="_blank" href="https://broadbandbreakfast.com/california-hearings-on-charter-cox-deal-approaching/"><span class="sqsrte-text-color--accent">Broadband Breakfast </span></a><strong>|By Jake Neenan</strong></p><p data-rte-preserve-empty="true" class="">California’s telecom regulator is set to hold evidentiary hearings this month in its review of the $34.5 billion Charter-Cox merger. The hearings&nbsp;are set for April 20-24. &nbsp;The California Public Utilities Commission is the last remaining agency that needs to clear the deal. The Federal Communications Commission, Justice Department, and states like New York and Connecticut have cleared the transaction. </p><p data-rte-preserve-empty="true" class=""><span class="sqsrte-text-color--darkAccent"><strong><em>A set of advocacy groups including&nbsp;The Utility Reform Network&nbsp;and the CPUC’s Public Advocates Office&nbsp;asked the agency to hold evidentiary hearings on a number of issues, including Charter upgrading and expanding its network after the deal, the merger’s effect on consumer privacy and Charter’s diversity commitments.</em></strong></span></p>


  






  



&nbsp;
  
  
  
    
      
        
      
    
    <input placeholder="Search" type="search" class="search-input" value="" aria-label="Search"
    />
  
  
  
    
    
      
        No results found
        
      
    
  
<p><a href="https://www.turn.org/turn-newsroom/california-hearings-on-charger-cox-deal-approaching">Permalink</a><p>]]></content:encoded><media:content type="image/png" url="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/63c1c8c8e9c7381c9319452b/1745965194440-UA8FYO3SM0UOXT5KCFVA/2025+TURN+Thumbnails-04.png?format=1500w" medium="image" isDefault="true" width="1500" height="847"><media:title type="plain">California Hearings on Charger-Cox Deal Approaching</media:title></media:content></item><item><title>PG&amp;E is Overcharging Californians to Keep the Last Nuclear Power Plant Open, Report Alleges</title><category>Newsroom</category><dc:creator>Alejandra Cruz</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2026 22:37:28 +0000</pubDate><link>https://www.latimes.com/environment/story/2026-04-07/pge-overcharging-diablo-canyon-report</link><guid isPermaLink="false">63c1c8c8e9c7381c9319452b:63c6fa36d8aa57147f387c7b:69d6d8a88c96fe0066990710</guid><description><![CDATA[Source: The Los Angeles Times | By Blanca Begert

“They picked a really high number for their incentives that was out of 
whack with what they could have earned,” said Matt Freedman, an attorney 
with the Utility Reform Network consumer advocacy group, who reviewed and 
provided the authors feedback on the report.

A new report alleges Pacific Gas & Electric inflated costs when it 
requested a loan for Diablo Canyon, potentially creating a $658.6-million 
cost to taxpayers if lawmakers don’t intervene.  If ratepayer fees for 
Diablo Canyon were eliminated from 2027-30, experts say, California utility 
customers could save an estimated $1.84 billion in controversial subsidies.]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p data-rte-preserve-empty="true" class=""><strong>Source:</strong><span class="sqsrte-text-color--accent"> </span><a target="_blank" href="https://www.latimes.com/environment/story/2026-04-07/pge-overcharging-diablo-canyon-report"><span class="sqsrte-text-color--accent">The Los Angeles Times</span></a><span class="sqsrte-text-color--accent"> </span><strong>|By Blanca Begert</strong></p><p data-rte-preserve-empty="true" class="">A new report alleges Pacific Gas &amp; Electric inflated costs when it requested a loan for Diablo Canyon, potentially creating a $658.6-million cost to taxpayers if lawmakers don’t intervene. &nbsp;If ratepayer fees for Diablo Canyon were eliminated from 2027-30, experts say, California utility customers could save an estimated $1.84 billion in controversial subsidies.</p><p data-rte-preserve-empty="true" class=""><span class="sqsrte-text-color--darkAccent"><strong><em>“They picked a really high number for their incentives that was out of whack with what they could have earned,” said&nbsp;Matt Freedman, an attorney with the Utility Reform Network consumer advocacy group, who reviewed and provided the authors feedback on the report.</em></strong></span></p>


  






  



&nbsp;
  
  
  
    
      
        
      
    
    <input placeholder="Search" type="search" class="search-input" value="" aria-label="Search"
    />
  
  
  
    
    
      
        No results found
        
      
    
  
<p><a href="https://www.turn.org/turn-newsroom/pge-is-overcharging-californians-to-keep-the-last-nuclear-power-plant-open-report-alleges">Permalink</a><p>]]></content:encoded><media:content type="image/png" url="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/63c1c8c8e9c7381c9319452b/1745965194440-UA8FYO3SM0UOXT5KCFVA/2025+TURN+Thumbnails-04.png?format=1500w" medium="image" isDefault="true" width="1500" height="847"><media:title type="plain">PG&amp;E is Overcharging Californians to Keep the Last Nuclear Power Plant Open, Report Alleges</media:title></media:content></item><item><title>California Approved a Gas Pipeline Solution. Now Comes the Hard Part.</title><category>Newsroom</category><dc:creator>Alejandra Cruz</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2026 22:32:49 +0000</pubDate><link>https://www.utilitydive.com/news/california-approved-a-gas-pipeline-solution-now-comes-the-hard-part/812087/</link><guid isPermaLink="false">63c1c8c8e9c7381c9319452b:63c6fa36d8aa57147f387c7b:69d6d7918c96fe006698a3c8</guid><description><![CDATA[Source: TURN | By Opinion by Jalal Awan at TURN

State utilities are spending billions of dollars every year to maintain and 
upgrade California’s natural gas distribution system just as we’re trying 
to wean ourselves off of this fossil fuel energy source that contributes to 
climate change.  One possible solution emerged from the state legislature 
and received Gov. Gavin Newsom’s blessing when he signed Senate Bill 1221 
into law in September 2024. 

The bill directs utilities to create “decarbonization zones” — designated 
neighborhoods where aging gas pipelines would be retired and residents 
helped to switch to electric appliances like heat pumps and induction 
stoves, funded by the savings from avoided pipeline replacements. The 
California Public Utilities Commission faces a monumental task in 
implementing this promising idea, but early evidence reveals how difficult 
it can be for regulators to uphold ratepayers’ interests when utilities 
control the data and have their own financial priorities.]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p data-rte-preserve-empty="true" class=""><strong>Source:</strong><span class="sqsrte-text-color--accent"> </span><a target="_blank" href="https://www.utilitydive.com/news/california-approved-a-gas-pipeline-solution-now-comes-the-hard-part/812087/"><span class="sqsrte-text-color--accent">Opinion by Jalal Awan at The Utility Reform Network</span></a><span class="sqsrte-text-color--accent"> </span></p><p data-rte-preserve-empty="true" class=""><span class="sqsrte-text-color--darkAccent"><strong><em>State utilities are spending billions of dollars every year to maintain and upgrade California’s natural gas distribution system just as we’re trying to wean ourselves off of this fossil fuel energy source that contributes to climate change. &nbsp;One possible solution emerged from the state legislature and received Gov. Gavin Newsom’s blessing when he signed Senate Bill 1221 into law in September 2024.&nbsp;The bill directs utilities to create “decarbonization zones” — designated neighborhoods where aging gas pipelines would be retired and residents helped to switch to electric appliances like heat pumps and induction stoves, funded by the savings from avoided pipeline replacements. The California Public Utilities Commission faces a monumental task in implementing this promising idea, but early evidence reveals how difficult it can be for regulators to uphold ratepayers’ interests when utilities control the data and have their own financial priorities.</em></strong></span></p>


  






  



&nbsp;
  
  
  
    
      
        
      
    
    <input placeholder="Search" type="search" class="search-input" value="" aria-label="Search"
    />
  
  
  
    
    
      
        No results found
        
      
    
  
<p><a href="https://www.turn.org/turn-newsroom/california-approved-a-gas-pipeline-solution-now-comes-the-hard-part">Permalink</a><p>]]></content:encoded><media:content type="image/png" url="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/63c1c8c8e9c7381c9319452b/1745965194440-UA8FYO3SM0UOXT5KCFVA/2025+TURN+Thumbnails-04.png?format=1500w" medium="image" isDefault="true" width="1500" height="847"><media:title type="plain">California Approved a Gas Pipeline Solution. Now Comes the Hard Part.</media:title></media:content></item><item><title>After Ever-Costlier California Fires, New Study Could Shape State’s Response to Era of ‘Climate-Fueled Economic Crisis’</title><category>Newsroom</category><dc:creator>Alejandra Cruz</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2026 22:16:05 +0000</pubDate><link>https://www.pressdemocrat.com/2026/03/28/california-wildifre-climate-disaster-study/</link><guid isPermaLink="false">63c1c8c8e9c7381c9319452b:63c6fa36d8aa57147f387c7b:69d6d3a58f44a7296a5f0376</guid><description><![CDATA[Source: The Press Democrat | By Marisa Endicott

“I wouldn’t be surprised if what gets decided this year will impact a 
generation,” said Mark Toney, executive director of The Utility Reform 
Network, who was heavily involved in shaping SB 254.

The release of another new study on the impacts of natural disasters in 
California may not normally get more than a shrug of wider public 
attention.  But a pending report out of the California Earthquake Authority 
looks to be more consequential than most as it seeks to answer the urgent, 
loaded question of how the state will address mounting and rippling costs 
of catastrophic events and who will pay.]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p data-rte-preserve-empty="true" class=""><strong>Source:</strong><span class="sqsrte-text-color--accent"> </span><a target="_blank" href="https://www.pressdemocrat.com/2026/03/28/california-wildifre-climate-disaster-study/"><span class="sqsrte-text-color--accent">The Press Democrat </span></a><span class="sqsrte-text-color--accent"> </span><strong>|By Marisa Endicott</strong></p><p data-rte-preserve-empty="true" class=""><span class="sqsrte-text-color--black">The release of another new study on the impacts of natural disasters in California may not normally get more than a shrug of wider public attention. &nbsp;But a pending report out of the California Earthquake Authority looks to be more consequential than most as it seeks to answer the urgent, loaded question of how the state will address mounting and rippling costs of catastrophic events and who will pay.</span></p><p data-rte-preserve-empty="true" class=""><span class="sqsrte-text-color--darkAccent"><strong><em>“I wouldn’t be surprised if what gets decided this year will impact a generation,” said Mark Toney, executive director of The Utility Reform Network, who was heavily involved in shaping SB 254.</em></strong></span></p>


  






  



&nbsp;
  
  
  
    
      
        
      
    
    <input placeholder="Search" type="search" class="search-input" value="" aria-label="Search"
    />
  
  
  
    
    
      
        No results found
        
      
    
  
<p><a href="https://www.turn.org/turn-newsroom/after-ever-costlier-california-fires-new-study-could-shape-states-response-to-era-of-climate-fueled-economic-crisis">Permalink</a><p>]]></content:encoded><media:content type="image/png" url="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/63c1c8c8e9c7381c9319452b/1745965194440-UA8FYO3SM0UOXT5KCFVA/2025+TURN+Thumbnails-04.png?format=1500w" medium="image" isDefault="true" width="1500" height="847"><media:title type="plain">After Ever-Costlier California Fires, New Study Could Shape State’s Response to Era of ‘Climate-Fueled Economic Crisis’</media:title></media:content></item><item><title>Electric bills: ‘One two three four! Edison profits make us poor!’</title><category>Newsroom</category><dc:creator>Alejandra Cruz</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2026 22:23:36 +0000</pubDate><link>https://www.turn.org/turn-newsroom/electric-bills-one-two-three-four-edison-profits-make-us-poor</link><guid isPermaLink="false">63c1c8c8e9c7381c9319452b:63c6fa36d8aa57147f387c7b:69d6d568a1c8ab3c3512e922</guid><description><![CDATA[Source: The Orange County Register | By Teri Sforza

Many of these legislative proposals are championed by The Utility Reform 
Network, which recently sponsored a poll that found an overwhelming 
majority of Californians — 81% — are somewhat or very concerned about their 
electric bills.  “The latest earnings reports make one thing painfully 
clear: while California families struggle with skyrocketing utility bills, 
investor-owned utilities are posting billions in profits,” said Mark Toney, 
TURN’s executive director, in a prepared statement.

The human dressed as Monopoly’s Moneybags man tossed fake dollar bills 
skyward.  “SO CAL EDISON SATAN,” proclaimed one protest sign. “STOP utility 
greed,” “ANAHEIM PUBLIC UTILITY CUSTOMERS PAY 58% LESS THAN EDISON 
CUSTOMERS” and “HONK IF U HATE SCE,” said others.  The honks came fast and 
furious in front of Irvine City Hall on Thursday.]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p data-rte-preserve-empty="true" class=""><strong>Source:</strong><span class="sqsrte-text-color--accent"> The Orange County Register </span><strong>|By Teri Sforza</strong></p><p data-rte-preserve-empty="true" class="">The human dressed as Monopoly’s Moneybags man tossed fake dollar bills skyward. &nbsp;“SO CAL EDISON SATAN,” proclaimed one protest sign. “STOP utility greed,” “ANAHEIM PUBLIC UTILITY CUSTOMERS PAY 58% LESS THAN EDISON CUSTOMERS” and “HONK IF U HATE SCE,” said others. &nbsp;The honks came fast and furious in front of Irvine City Hall on Thursday.</p><p data-rte-preserve-empty="true" class=""><span class="sqsrte-text-color--darkAccent"><strong><em>Many of these legislative proposals are championed by The Utility Reform Network, which recently sponsored a poll that found an overwhelming majority of Californians — 81% — are somewhat or very concerned about their electric bills. &nbsp;“The latest earnings reports make one thing painfully clear: while California families struggle with skyrocketing utility bills, investor-owned utilities are posting billions in profits,” said Mark Toney, TURN’s executive director, in a prepared statement.</em></strong></span></p>


  






  



&nbsp;
  
  
  
    
      
        
      
    
    <input placeholder="Search" type="search" class="search-input" value="" aria-label="Search"
    />
  
  
  
    
    
      
        No results found
        
      
    
  
<p><a href="https://www.turn.org/turn-newsroom/electric-bills-one-two-three-four-edison-profits-make-us-poor">Permalink</a><p>]]></content:encoded><media:content type="image/png" url="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/63c1c8c8e9c7381c9319452b/1745965194440-UA8FYO3SM0UOXT5KCFVA/2025+TURN+Thumbnails-04.png?format=1500w" medium="image" isDefault="true" width="1500" height="847"><media:title type="plain">Electric bills: ‘One two three four! Edison profits make us poor!’</media:title></media:content></item><item><title>Weeks-Long AT&amp;T Outage in Shelter Valley, Near Julian, Raises Safety Concerns for Rural Residents</title><category>Newsroom</category><dc:creator>Alejandra Cruz</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2026 22:10:54 +0000</pubDate><link>https://www.cbs8.com/article/news/local/weeks-long-att-outage-in-shelter-valley-near-julian-raises-safety-concerns/509-45912510-da7f-4f18-be52-c8e31f0d5f74</link><guid isPermaLink="false">63c1c8c8e9c7381c9319452b:63c6fa36d8aa57147f387c7b:69d6d26e1ff48308dbfcaa0d</guid><description><![CDATA[Source: CBS 8 | By Brian White

TURN is advocating for stricter repair timelines and penalties, while 
warning that AT&T is pushing to loosen those requirements.  “TURN is filing 
comments and fighting for rules for AT&T and other companies to have faster 
response time when the service goes out and put teeth in those so they 
would have to pay bigger fines," Toney said. "That’s what motivates a big 
company like AT&T. You['ve] got to hit them in the pocketbook or else they 
have no motivation.”

The outage was caused by storm damage in February, when high winds knocked 
out key infrastructure. According to AT&T, two critical relay towers were 
severely damaged. While some areas in Julian have seen service restored, 
more remote communities like Shelter Valley and Butterfield continue to 
face prolonged disruptions.  For residents, the lack of reliable 
communication is more than an inconvenience; it’s a serious safety concern.]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p data-rte-preserve-empty="true" class=""><strong>Source:</strong><span class="sqsrte-text-color--accent"> </span><a target="_blank" href="https://www.cbs8.com/article/news/local/weeks-long-att-outage-in-shelter-valley-near-julian-raises-safety-concerns/509-45912510-da7f-4f18-be52-c8e31f0d5f74"><span class="sqsrte-text-color--accent">CBS 8</span></a><span class="sqsrte-text-color--accent">‍  ‍</span><strong>|By Brian White</strong></p><p data-rte-preserve-empty="true" class="">The outage was caused by storm damage in February, when high winds knocked out key infrastructure. According to AT&amp;T, two critical relay towers were severely damaged. While some areas in Julian have seen service restored, more remote communities like Shelter Valley and Butterfield continue to face prolonged disruptions. &nbsp;For residents, the lack of reliable communication is more than an inconvenience; it’s a serious safety concern.</p><p data-rte-preserve-empty="true" class=""><span class="sqsrte-text-color--darkAccent"><strong><em>TURN is advocating for stricter repair timelines and penalties, while warning that AT&amp;T is pushing to loosen those requirements. &nbsp;“TURN is filing comments and fighting for rules for AT&amp;T and other companies to have faster response time when the service goes out and put teeth in those so they would have to pay bigger fines," Toney said. "That’s what motivates a big company like AT&amp;T. You['ve] got to hit them in the pocketbook or else they have no motivation.”</em></strong></span></p>


  






  



&nbsp;
  
  
  
    
      
        
      
    
    <input placeholder="Search" type="search" class="search-input" value="" aria-label="Search"
    />
  
  
  
    
    
      
        No results found
        
      
    
  
<p><a href="https://www.turn.org/turn-newsroom/weeks-long-att-outage-in-shelter-valley-near-julian-raises-safety-concerns-for-rural-residents">Permalink</a><p>]]></content:encoded><media:content type="image/png" url="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/63c1c8c8e9c7381c9319452b/1745965194440-UA8FYO3SM0UOXT5KCFVA/2025+TURN+Thumbnails-04.png?format=1500w" medium="image" isDefault="true" width="1500" height="847"><media:title type="plain">Weeks-Long AT&amp;T Outage in Shelter Valley, Near Julian, Raises Safety Concerns for Rural Residents</media:title></media:content></item><item><title>California Lawmakers Move to Shield Homeowners From Data Center Utility Hikes</title><category>Newsroom</category><dc:creator>Alejandra Cruz</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2026 22:06:19 +0000</pubDate><link>https://www.ivpressonline.com/news/california-lawmakers-move-to-shield-homeowners-from-data-center-utility-hikes/article_1ce964a2-0029-4675-987f-eb341ebbe57a.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">63c1c8c8e9c7381c9319452b:63c6fa36d8aa57147f387c7b:69d6d15b3be3c70f15847d78</guid><description><![CDATA[Source: Imperial Valley Press | By Staff Report

The legislative package has earned the backing of both consumer and 
environmental advocates, including The Utility Reform Network (TURN) and 
Net Zero California.  “Senator Padilla’s bills include critical protections 
to ensure that data center development will benefit the electrical grid, 
consumers, and the environment,” said Matthew Freedman, staff attorney for 
TURN.

Two California State Senate committees took a major step this week toward 
ensuring that the rapid expansion of "Big Tech" infrastructure doesn't come 
at the expense of local families’ utility bills or the environment.]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p data-rte-preserve-empty="true" class=""><strong>Source:</strong><a target="_blank" href="https://www.ivpressonline.com/news/california-lawmakers-move-to-shield-homeowners-from-data-center-utility-hikes/article_1ce964a2-0029-4675-987f-eb341ebbe57a.html"><span class="sqsrte-text-color--accent">Imperial Valley Press</span></a><span class="sqsrte-text-color--accent"> (external link, opens in a new tab)</span><strong>|By Staff Report</strong></p><p data-rte-preserve-empty="true" class="">Two California State Senate committees took a major step this week toward ensuring that the rapid expansion of "Big Tech" infrastructure doesn't come at the expense of local families’ utility bills or the environment.</p><p data-rte-preserve-empty="true" class=""><span class="sqsrte-text-color--darkAccent"><strong><em>The legislative package has earned the backing of both consumer and environmental advocates, including The Utility Reform Network (TURN) and Net Zero California. &nbsp;“Senator Padilla’s bills include critical protections to ensure that data center development will benefit the electrical grid, consumers, and the environment,” said Matthew Freedman, staff attorney for TURN.</em></strong></span></p>


  






  



&nbsp;
  
  
  
    
      
        
      
    
    <input placeholder="Search" type="search" class="search-input" value="" aria-label="Search"
    />
  
  
  
    
    
      
        No results found
        
      
    
  
<p><a href="https://www.turn.org/turn-newsroom/california-lawmakers-move-to-shield-homeowners-from-data-center-utility-hikes">Permalink</a><p>]]></content:encoded><media:content type="image/png" url="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/63c1c8c8e9c7381c9319452b/1745965194440-UA8FYO3SM0UOXT5KCFVA/2025+TURN+Thumbnails-04.png?format=1500w" medium="image" isDefault="true" width="1500" height="847"><media:title type="plain">California Lawmakers Move to Shield Homeowners From Data Center Utility Hikes</media:title></media:content></item><item><title>Bills Protecting Ratepayers from Data Center Costs and Incentivizing Sustainable Tech Infrastructure Development Pass Key Senate Committees</title><category>Newsroom</category><dc:creator>Alejandra Cruz</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2026 22:00:38 +0000</pubDate><link>https://sd18.senate.ca.gov/news/bills-protecting-ratepayers-data-center-costs-and-incentivizing-sustainable-tech-0</link><guid isPermaLink="false">63c1c8c8e9c7381c9319452b:63c6fa36d8aa57147f387c7b:69d6d00662d42d03269405f3</guid><description><![CDATA[Source: News from the Office of Steve Padilla |

The legislative package is co-sponsored by ratepayer advocacy group TURN 
and environmental advocacy group Net-Zero California.  “California needs 
clear, meaningful and ambitious policies to address the rapid growth of 
data centers,” said Matthew Freedman, Staff Attorney at The Utility Reform 
Network (TURN). “Senator Padilla’s bills include critical protections to 
ensure that data center development will benefit the electrical grid, 
consumers and the environment.”

This week, two key committees in the California State Senate passed Senate 
Bills 886 and 887, two measures authored by Senator Steve Padilla (D-San 
Diego) designed to protect California ratepayers from the potential 
increased costs and environmental damage caused by data centers.]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p data-rte-preserve-empty="true" class=""><strong>Source:</strong><a target="_blank" href="https://sd18.senate.ca.gov/news/bills-protecting-ratepayers-data-center-costs-and-incentivizing-sustainable-tech-0"><span class="sqsrte-text-color--accent"> News from the Office of Steve Padilla </span></a><strong>|By </strong></p><p data-rte-preserve-empty="true" class="">This week, two key committees in the California State Senate passed Senate Bills 886 and 887&nbsp;two measures authored by Senator Steve Padilla (D-San Diego) designed to protect California ratepayers from the potential increased costs and environmental damage caused by data centers.</p><p data-rte-preserve-empty="true" class=""><span class="sqsrte-text-color--darkAccent"><strong><em>The legislative package is co-sponsored by ratepayer advocacy group TURN and environmental advocacy group Net-Zero California. &nbsp;“California needs clear, meaningful and ambitious policies to address the rapid growth of data centers,” said&nbsp;Matthew Freedman, Staff Attorney at The Utility Reform Network (TURN).&nbsp;“Senator Padilla’s bills include critical protections to ensure that data center development will benefit the electrical grid, consumers and the environment.”</em></strong></span></p>


  






  



&nbsp;
  
  
  
    
      
        
      
    
    <input placeholder="Search" type="search" class="search-input" value="" aria-label="Search"
    />
  
  
  
    
    
      
        No results found
        
      
    
  
<p><a href="https://www.turn.org/turn-newsroom/bills-protecting-ratepayers-from-data-center-costs-and-incentivizing-sustainable-tech-infrastructure-development-pass-key-senate-committees">Permalink</a><p>]]></content:encoded><media:content type="image/png" url="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/63c1c8c8e9c7381c9319452b/1745965194440-UA8FYO3SM0UOXT5KCFVA/2025+TURN+Thumbnails-04.png?format=1500w" medium="image" isDefault="true" width="1500" height="847"><media:title type="plain">Bills Protecting Ratepayers from Data Center Costs and Incentivizing Sustainable Tech Infrastructure Development Pass Key Senate Committees</media:title></media:content></item><item><title>Incarcerated Phone Service Providers Urge CPUC to Reject New Rate Cap Ahead of Vote</title><category>Newsroom</category><dc:creator>Alejandra Cruz</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2026 20:37:16 +0000</pubDate><link>https://communicationsdaily.com/news/2026/03/13/Incarcerated-Phone-Service-Providers-Urge-CPUC-to-Reject-New-Rate-Cap-Ahead-of-Vote-2603120021</link><guid isPermaLink="false">63c1c8c8e9c7381c9319452b:63c6fa36d8aa57147f387c7b:69b4757c066ad768895cbdce</guid><description><![CDATA[Source: Communications Daily | By Philip Athey

Securus argued that it did submit some cost data that was previously filed 
with the FCC while the federal regulator was working on national price caps 
for IPCS, but the accuracy of that data has been questioned, including by 
the Utilities Reform Network (TURN).  “By its own terms, the PD [proposed 
decision says] that this submission was not sufficiently detailed to 
substantiate Securus’ claims,” TURN’s filing said. "As TURN observed in 
reply comments on the staff proposal, the FCC determined that the 
information submitted by Securus was 'imperfect and cannot simply be taken 
at face value.’"

Prison phone service providers called for the California Public Utilities 
Commission to reject a new rule that would lower the cap on rates they can 
charge for intrastate calls by inmates in the state. The final vote on the 
rule is set for CPUC's March 19 meeting.]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p data-rte-preserve-empty="true" class=""><strong>Source:</strong><a target="_blank" href="https://communicationsdaily.com/news/2026/03/13/Incarcerated-Phone-Service-Providers-Urge-CPUC-to-Reject-New-Rate-Cap-Ahead-of-Vote-2603120021"><span class="sqsrte-text-color--accent">Communications Daily</span></a><span class="sqsrte-text-color--accent">‍  ‍</span><strong>|By Philip Athey</strong></p><p data-rte-preserve-empty="true" class="">Prison phone service providers called for the California Public Utilities Commission to reject a new rule that would lower the cap on rates they can charge for intrastate calls by inmates in the state. The final vote on the rule is set for CPUC's March 19 meeting.&nbsp;</p><p data-rte-preserve-empty="true" class=""><span class="sqsrte-text-color--darkAccent"><strong><em>Securus argued that it did submit some cost data that was previously filed with the FCC while the federal regulator was working on national price caps for IPCS, but the accuracy of that data has been questioned, including by the Utilities Reform Network (TURN). &nbsp;“By its own terms, the PD [proposed decision says] that this submission was not sufficiently detailed to substantiate Securus’ claims,”TURN’s filing said. </em></strong></span></p>


  






  



&nbsp;
  
  
  
    
      
        
      
    
    <input placeholder="Search" type="search" class="search-input" value="" aria-label="Search"
    />
  
  
  
    
    
      
        No results found
        
      
    
  
<p><a href="https://www.turn.org/turn-newsroom/incarcerated-phone-service-providers-urge-cpuc-to-reject-new-rate-cap-ahead-of-vote">Permalink</a><p>]]></content:encoded><media:content type="image/png" url="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/63c1c8c8e9c7381c9319452b/1745965194440-UA8FYO3SM0UOXT5KCFVA/2025+TURN+Thumbnails-04.png?format=1500w" medium="image" isDefault="true" width="1500" height="847"><media:title type="plain">Incarcerated Phone Service Providers Urge CPUC to Reject New Rate Cap Ahead of Vote</media:title></media:content></item></channel></rss>